Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law

Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law

Blog Article

Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔

4.  It has been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of at some point in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of the alleged incidence and also the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to be the real brothers in the deceased but they did not respond in the slightest degree into the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many instances that extra judicial confession of the accused can be a weak sort of evidence which could be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is likewise counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word concerning existence of some light on the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners alongside one another on the motorcycle at four.

This unfortunate ambiguity results from the law regarding murder and manslaughter being repugnant with each other.

The stated recovery may be used, within the most, for corroboration of your main evidence, but by itself it cannot be considered a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of occurrence. The claimed memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as absolutely nothing was discovered because of these pointation. The place of occurrence as well as the place of throwing the dead body were already in the knowledge of witnesses prior to their pointation because of the petitioners. Reliance is usually placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:

Power to levy tax also to legislate on immovable property including tax on yearly rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)

ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is well-settled that though thinking about the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the benefit of many of the qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of suitable candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked because of the respondent department just to increase favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, here which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.

Any court may search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

Please note, When you are seeking a price exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly. 

                                                                  

ten. Without touching the merits of the case with the issue of annual increases within the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, this sort of annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment for being made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness from the regulation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.

competent authority has determined the eligibility of your private respondents and found them to get fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)